EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-03/000418_owner-lightwave-l _Tue Mar 21 08:16:20 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-04-09 | 2KB

Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom6.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
    id HAA27721; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 07:34:21 -0800
Received: from redmail.tamu.edu by netcom6.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
    id HAA27707; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 07:34:14 -0800
From: [e-mail]
Received: from REDMAIL-Message_Server by redmail.tamu.edu
    with WordPerfect_Office; Tue, 21 Mar 1995 08:48:40 -0600
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
X-Mailer: WordPerfect Office 4.0
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 12:36:35 -0600
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Subject:  Re: Apologies to George (Explo -Reply
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

     [. . .bandwidth reduction here. . .message clipped]

 The law still seems to allow you to copy some one elses work as a
base to build on your own work. If I was to do a collage of pictures for
example I could use anyone elses pictures in that collage without their
permisson because the collage constitutes a seprate artwork in and of
it's self. So I would think that if you used those frames in a 3D animation
you could legaly claim that you have created a separate artwork.
  .....but I may be wrong about all this and I maybe sued tomorrow.
  [e-mail]

   I believe you are dead wrong!  Corel recently conducted a 'best of'
contest, where they promised the winner $4,000 cash, software, etc.
AFTER they awarded the prize, somebody stepped in and noted that the
'winner' had used a face of an indian chief in his COMPOSITE image.  He
had mistakenly thought that if he were to paint on the original image, it
would macigally become his own.  He was wrong.  Corel, embarrassed,
had to ask for the cash back and look for another winner.

BTW, the guy foolishly decided to fight COREL on this, and said he
wasn't giving up the $4K.